Meeting of the ARIN Advisory Council

Thursday, 30 August 2007
Teleconference

Minutes

Attendees:

  • Marla Azinger (MA), Chair     
  • Ron da Silva, (RD), Vice Chair
  • Dan Alexander (DA)               
  • Paul Andersen (PA)               
  • Cathy Aronson (CA)
  • Leo Bicknell (LB)                   
  • Bill Darte (BD)
  • Alec Peterson (AP)
  • Matt Pounsett (MP)                
  • Lea Roberts (LR)
  • Robert Seastrom (RS)              
  • Stacy Taylor (ST)                     
  • Suzanne Woolf (SW)    

ARIN Staff:

  • Therese Colosi, Scribe
  • Nate Davis (ND), COO
  • Richard Jimmerson (RJ), CIO
  • Leslie Nobile (LN), Director Registration Services
  • Ray Plzak (RP), President & CEO

Apologies:

  • Alex Rubenstein
  • Heather Schiller

1. Welcome

The Chair called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. EDT. The presence of quorum was noted.

2. Agenda Bashing

The Chair called for any comments.

3. Policy Proposal: IPv6 Assignment Guidelines.

LR moved:

"The ARIN Advisory Council, having reviewed the proposal entitled ‘IPv6 Assignment Guidelines', accepts it as written as a formal policy proposal; and, requests the President assign it a formal policy proposal number."

This was seconded by BD. The Chair called for discussion. RS stated that he did not see any serious opposition to this proposal, and felt it was ready to move forward. Others agreed.

The motion carried with twelve in favor and 1 abstention (LB) via roll call.

4. Policy Proposal: IPv6 Policy Housekeeping

RS moved:

"The ARIN Advisory Council, having reviewed the proposal entitled ‘IPv6 Policy Housekeeping', accepts it as written as a formal policy proposal; and, requests the President assign it a formal policy proposal number."

This was seconded by MP. The Chair called for discussion. LB clarified this motion moved forward version 2 of this policy proposal. All confirmed. 

RD joined at this time (4:09 p.m. EDT).

The motion carried with thirteen in favor and 1 abstention (LB) via roll call.

5.  Any Other Business

The Chair called for any other business. MP stated that the other half of LB's proposal, which are topics the Board can edit, needs a motion from the AC recommending that the Board to do so at some point. LB explained that the text needed to go through NRPM editing prior to recommendation to the Board.  The AC was in agreement that the remaining subject matter needs to go through the NRPM process.

6.  Adjournment

The Chair entertained a motion to adjourn at 4:14 p.m. EDT. RS moved to adjourn, and this was seconded by ST. The motion carried unanimously.