Draft Policies and Proposals
|Policy Proposal Evaluation Status:||Author|
|Adopted - NRPM Sections 188.8.131.52, 184.108.40.206.2 and 220.127.116.11||Robert Seastrom|
Formal introduction on PPML on 1 September 2005
Last Call from 31 October through 15 November 2005
|Public Policy Mailing List|
|ARIN Public Policy Meeting:||ARIN XVI|
|ARIN Advisory Council:||27 October
17 November 2005
|ARIN Board of Trustees:||12 February 2006|
|Click here to view previous versions.||17 February 2006|
In existing policy 18.104.22.168, replace the phrase "multi-homed organizations must:" with the phrase "organizations applying under the multi-homed policy must:"
In existing policy 22.214.171.124.2, replace "Provide information showing that the requested IP address space will be utilized within three months." with "Provide information showing that the requested IP address space will be utilized within three months and demonstrating an intent to announce the requested space in a multi-homed fasion."
In existing 126.96.36.199, replace "For multihomed end-users, the minimum block of IP address space assigned is a /22." with "For end-users who demonstrate an intent to announce the requested space in a multihomed fashion, the minimum block of IP address space assigned is a /22."
Presently, organizations wishing to apply for their first address space under the multi-homed policy must demonstrate that they have ALREADY announced a DIFFERENT address block via multi-homing, while simultaneously promising to renumber out of that same block.
This creates needless make-work for ISPs which are planning to multi-home, related to old resources which they're already trying to get out of. Likewise, it creates needless work for both of their upstream providers, who have to temporarily announce a prefix which DOESN'T NEED to be multi-homed, solely to demonstrate to ARIN analysts that the applying ISP is multi-homed. However, this same criterion can be demonstrated just as effectively by the applying ISP showing the analyst contracts with multiple ISPs under which the newly-applied-for block WILL BE multi-homed, and this more accurately reflects the intent of the original policy, while removing needless make-work at a time when the applicant is surely already quite busy with the real requirements of their change-over.