Your IP address could not be determined at this time.

ACSP Suggestion 2011.17: Define access restrictions for APIs

Suggestion

Author:
Mike Joseph
Submitted On:
11 April 2011

The introduction of the new RESTful interface and API keys are a welcome step to the automation of ARIN's database management. However, the current security model creates a particular complication. In order to use the RESTful API to automate something, it is now necessary to store that credential in a system that is most likely visible to more than just the person who the credential represents.

I therefore suggest that ARIN develop an ability to define access restrictions for each API generated. These restrictions should allow the registrant to specify exactly which RESTful (and therefore template) actions may be performed using the key (including separation of read and write access for each type of modification).

It should also be possible to limit the API key to performing actions on behalf of a specific POC, rather than all POCs to which the ARIN online account is linked. This would prevent the need for creating a number of "role" ARIN online accounts for the sole purpose of making a POC-specific API key.

Timeframe: Immediate

Status:
Open
Updated:
20 July 2011

Tracking Information

ARIN Comment

12 May 2011

The initial goal in moving to API Keys was to create a better security framework for ARIN's provisioning system. As we investigate further improvements, we would like to take your suggestion of access control to the community for input. We will be gathering feedback from the community at large about preferences for the setup of simplified access control. It is our intent to schedule a focus time at the next ARIN meeting to discuss various approaches to this issue. The staff will then use that input as a basis for requirements to build access controls into API keys.

This suggestion will remain open until we determine the best course of action.

ARIN Comment

20 July 2011

Mike,

During ARIN XXVIII in Philadelphia, there will be an ARIN Online Users Forum, during which this and several other ARIN Online-related suggestions. We encourage you to attend and participate. If you are unable to participate in person, we will also be offering remote participation and encourage you to participate remotely. Discussing ehancements with a larger audience will help us determine need and priority. This suggestion will remain open until resolved.

ARIN Comment

09 April 2012

Staff has determined that it would cost approximately $1,458,000 in engineering efforts plus significant communcations work on current API documentation to implement. Adding access level restrictions to API functions will create code complexity and possible end user confusion.